“Income-tax rates are going up so it becomes more expensive for a grantor to maintain the grantor trust status of a trust they’ve set up,” says Lynn Halpern Lederman, managing director and senior fiduciary counsel – Northeast Region at Bessemer Trust, a New York firm that oversees $97.5 billion.
A Wall Street Journal article, titled "Rethinking Some Grantor Trusts," says that the latest bull market created potentially substantial taxable gains for individuals—and with the top federal rate on long-term capital gains at nearly 24%, as compared to 15% in 2012—there's a concern that some people may have a harder time paying that income tax bill.
How does this affect grantor trusts?
Intentionally defective grantor trusts ("IDGTs") have become very popular in estate planning because they allow the grantor to move assets out of his or her taxable estate. This lowers their potential estate taxes, while remaining responsible for the income taxes, so that the income tax burden isn’t transferred to heirs.
However, increasing income tax rates means that it becomes more expensive for a grantor to maintain the grantor trust status of a trust they’ve set up. One way around this is a clause that allows grantors to essentially turn off the grantor status of the trust. This means the trust must pay its own income taxes going forward. But this election can only be made once—the grantor can’t switch back and forth from paying to not paying the income taxes—so there needs to be some careful consideration of this decision.
Higher income taxes have prompted some to take a closer look at the assets held in grantor-retained annuity trusts ("GRATs"), which allow individuals to put some of an asset’s future profits to heirs free of gift or estate tax. Most of this planning revolves around the “step-up” in cost basis, which helps eliminate the long-term capital-gains tax on assets that are held until death by raising the owner’s cost basis for these assets to the full market value. However, in a GRAT, the assets transferred to beneficiaries usually doesn’t receive that step-up at death, so to cut down on capital-gains taxes, the original article says that it's better to have higher basis assets in the GRAT because those assets won’t get a step-up in basis.
In addition, the original article suggests swapping out low-basis assets that have recorded gains in the trust with high-basis assets, like cash, and this swapping can also be implemented with IDGTs that still have their grantor status.
Sound a little tricky? Your estate planning attorney can help you sort through this and find the best strategies for your situation.
Reference: Wall Street Journal (October 29, 2014) "Rethinking Some Grantor Trusts"
Holden Campbell, LLC - Annapolis, Maryland Estate Planning Attorneys